On May 7, 2025, the Department of Defense published a memo in which it admitted in writing that the implementation of its covid shot mandate was unlawful.
Soldiers, and many other people, were under duress to comply with vaccine mandates, under threat of losing their livelihood.
It’s impossible for vaccinators to obtain valid voluntary informed consent for vaccination from people who are under duress to comply - duress vitiates consent.
How could the vaccinators collaborate with this intimidation? They knew people were appearing before them under coercion, they should have refused to participate in this assault - they are the ones wielding the needle piercing the skin and injecting the contents, is this not battery without valid consent?
This is relevant to my query re the US PREP Act, see my email sent on 27 February 2025:
QUOTE
For the attention of:
Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
US Department of Health and Human Services
Dear Secretary Kennedy, please could you advise to what extent the PREP Act provides immunity from criminal liability for administrators of medical countermeasures, that would arise where battery and clinical negligence occur due to a failure to obtain valid informed consent for medical countermeasures?
I look forward to your response on this matter.
Yours sincerely
Elizabeth Hart
Independent researcher investigating the vaccine industry and conflicts of interest in vaccination policy
I previously sent my query to former HHS Secretary Xavier Becerra on 23 April 2024, with no response, and no response as yet from HHS Secretary Kennedy.
Re the reference to vaccination ‘exemption’ requests in the video, which are unlikely to be approved.
There shouldn’t even be ‘exemptions’ for vaccination, as people should freely ‘give’ their informed consent for the intervention, or refuse it if they so choose, without penalty.
How can there be ‘exemptions’ to NOT have a vaccination?
Vaccinators are obligated to obtain valid voluntary informed consent for vaccination, so again, ‘exemptions’ should not exist.
Of course this has been a travesty for years, with children, medical workers and military recruits subject to vaccination mandates. This has been rife in the US - how has this been allowed to occur? Why didn’t the medical profession call this out years ago, instead of violating the obligation to obtain valid voluntary informed consent?
I've published a post on this now, including reference to Service members being vaccinated under duress - under threat of losing their livelihood and military career - without valid voluntary informed consent: US DoD admits vaccination mandate "was unlawful as implemented..." https://elizabethhart.substack.com/p/us-dod-admits-vaccination-mandate
https://www.defense.gov/Portals/1/Spotlight/2025/Guidance_For_Federal_Policies/Supplemental-Guidance-to-the-Military-Department-Discharge-Review-Boards-and-Boards-for-Correction-of-Military-Naval-Records.pdf
Thank you.
Soldiers, and many other people, were under duress to comply with vaccine mandates, under threat of losing their livelihood.
It’s impossible for vaccinators to obtain valid voluntary informed consent for vaccination from people who are under duress to comply - duress vitiates consent.
How could the vaccinators collaborate with this intimidation? They knew people were appearing before them under coercion, they should have refused to participate in this assault - they are the ones wielding the needle piercing the skin and injecting the contents, is this not battery without valid consent?
This is relevant to my query re the US PREP Act, see my email sent on 27 February 2025:
QUOTE
For the attention of:
Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
US Department of Health and Human Services
Dear Secretary Kennedy, please could you advise to what extent the PREP Act provides immunity from criminal liability for administrators of medical countermeasures, that would arise where battery and clinical negligence occur due to a failure to obtain valid informed consent for medical countermeasures?
I look forward to your response on this matter.
Yours sincerely
Elizabeth Hart
Independent researcher investigating the vaccine industry and conflicts of interest in vaccination policy
vaccinationispolitical.net
elizabethhart.substack.com
END OF QUOTE
I previously sent my query to former HHS Secretary Xavier Becerra on 23 April 2024, with no response, and no response as yet from HHS Secretary Kennedy.
Re the reference to vaccination ‘exemption’ requests in the video, which are unlikely to be approved.
There shouldn’t even be ‘exemptions’ for vaccination, as people should freely ‘give’ their informed consent for the intervention, or refuse it if they so choose, without penalty.
How can there be ‘exemptions’ to NOT have a vaccination?
Vaccinators are obligated to obtain valid voluntary informed consent for vaccination, so again, ‘exemptions’ should not exist.
Of course this has been a travesty for years, with children, medical workers and military recruits subject to vaccination mandates. This has been rife in the US - how has this been allowed to occur? Why didn’t the medical profession call this out years ago, instead of violating the obligation to obtain valid voluntary informed consent?
It seems the case Jacobson v. Massachusetts has been misused to support vaccination mandates, see for example my article: Jacobson v. Massachusetts...and the obligation for valid consent for vaccination... https://elizabethhart.substack.com/p/jacobson-v-massachusettsand-the-obligation
I've published a post on this now, including reference to Service members being vaccinated under duress - under threat of losing their livelihood and military career - without valid voluntary informed consent: US DoD admits vaccination mandate "was unlawful as implemented..." https://elizabethhart.substack.com/p/us-dod-admits-vaccination-mandate
“duress vitiates consent”
💯🎯
Thanks for this update.
Have you got a link to the 7 May 2025 memo?
Hi Elizabeth,
See TexBritta's response.
Kind Regards
Thank you Brad.
https://www.facebook.com/laura.lynn.347885/videos/724800200071039/?mibextid=CDWPTG
Please review this case.
https://www.courthousenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/coast-guard-vaccine-lawsuit.pdf
This is the case where the court claim that the military mandates for vaccine was UNLAWFUL ORDER!